Agent Architectures Overview
Understanding different agent architectures is crucial for building effective AI systems.
ReAct (Reasoning + Acting)
ReAct combines reasoning traces with action execution. The agent alternates between:
- Thought: Internal reasoning about the current state
- Action: Taking an action in the environment
- Observation: Receiving feedback from the action
# ReAct loop example
def react_agent(task):
while not complete:
thought = llm.think(f"Task: {task}\nHistory: {history}")
action = llm.decide_action(thought)
observation = environment.execute(action)
history.append((thought, action, observation))
Plan-and-Execute
This architecture separates planning from execution:
- Create a complete plan upfront
- Execute each step sequentially
- Re-plan if necessary
# Plan-and-Execute
plan = planner.create_plan(task)
for step in plan.steps:
result = executor.run(step)
if result.failed:
plan = planner.replan(task, result.error)
Reflection Architecture
Agents that review and improve their own outputs:
result = agent.execute(task)
reflection = agent.reflect(result)
if reflection.needs_improvement:
result = agent.revise(result, reflection.feedback)
Multi-Agent Systems
Multiple specialized agents working together:
Orchestrator Agent
├── Research Agent → gathers information
├── Analysis Agent → processes data
└── Writer Agent → generates output
Choosing an Architecture
| Architecture | Best For | Complexity |
|---|---|---|
| ReAct | Dynamic, exploratory tasks | Low |
| Plan-and-Execute | Well-defined, multi-step tasks | Medium |
| Reflection | Quality-critical outputs | Medium |
| Multi-Agent | Complex, parallelizable tasks | High |
Best Practices
- Start simple, add complexity as needed
- Always include error handling and recovery
- Monitor and log agent behavior for debugging
- Set clear stopping conditions to prevent infinite loops